Mr. Berry, certainly it comes as no surprise that you have parroted all the official denial narratives for the “chemtrail” term, right down to the exclusive use of that term while not once even mentioning a single science term (in your “debunking” message to this group) for the subject at hand (such as “geoengineering”, “climate engineering”. “stratospheric aerosol geoengineering”, “solar radiation management” (SRM), “cloud albedo enhancement” (CAI), etc, etc.) Waiving your credentials around as some sort of a license on reality and truth also holds no water whatsoever. You, like many other academicians, are always ready to repeat the official narrative of denial as we all know that is the only acceptable career decision for you. What happens when academicians are asked to deny the the climate engineering issue ON THE RECORD? Check the link below and you will see. Our legal team, The Legal Alliance to Stop Geoenigneering (LASG) conducted a survey of almost 1500 climate scientists and meteorologists, not one of them was willing to deny the geoenigneering reality on the record when the science terms were used.
Next, I sincerely hope that everyone on this email list takes the time to at least open the link below and look at the NASA satellite images it contains. These images are smoking gun proof of massive atmospheric manipulation with atmospherically ionizing aerosols and radio frequency/microwave transmissions.
About jets dispersing aerosols at altitude, though you will certainly deny any form of proof Ed, as that appears to be part of your job description, I can only hope the rest of the individuals on this list examine the two very short videos below (2 minutes each) and make up their own minds with their on sense of reason and logic.